11 responses to “Breaking News: New BMW Sound Logo

  1. I agree. It sounds like…nothing.

    After being an advertising Creative Director for over 25 years, and also being a musician in parallel, I’ve just started a sonic branding company in India called ‘BrandMusiq’.

    I think BMW has used the Intel sonic logo as a starting point and has ended up creating something that’s neither here nor there.

    • Hi Rajeev,
      interesting that you mention the Intel Sound Logo. I have no clue what they had in mind. I can only imagine that the board of directors approved it after they had seen a 30-minute presentation on “how BMW should sound”….

  2. unbelievable. after using a quite good sound logo for years… they come out with this trash

    • Hi Alberto,
      the problem with the old one was that hardly anyone did recognize it or could recall which brand it was. But compared to the new one the old Sound Logo is much more stylish and does better fit to BMW.

  3. It would be interesting to see the process they used to arrive at this end – and particularly interesting to see what, if any, testing was involved. I’m still trying to get a sense of how this is congruent with the brand identity. There’s certainly little to no flexibility for adapting/evolving it and still maintaining its essence. You could argue that it’s distinct and potentially recognizable – but I think more because of the negative reaction to it. It’s questionable that a brand wants to be remembered as “the guys with the weird audio logo…”

  4. I found it interesting that they still used two percussive hits in the new logo, but they felt so much less impactful than in the previous ad. The two strikes sounded very powerful and gave me the feeling that there was a high level of craftsmanship involved in the older ad.
    I would like to have heard them do something that actually enhanced that feeling, rather than detract from it by using less impactful strikes and throwing some notes around them.

  5. I’m coming late to this discussion, but find it interesting that all the comments have been about the “sound logo” and no-one has said anything about the fact that the whole music track of this spot seems to have been written without any regard for the fact that there would be a wall-to-wall voice over. The orchestration fights with the voice making it – for me – an unpleasant listening experience.

  6. I liked the old one. Especially the story behinbd the branding! The new one sounds interesting but not very chracteristic. And i’m wondering about the main issue behind the brand?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s